| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2015] NZERA Auckland 78 |
| Determination date | 17 March 2015 |
| Member | TG Tetitaha |
| Representation | S E Greening ; H Patel |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Knight v Printek Supplies Ltd t/a Datatek Pacific |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful personal grievance - One day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $3,208 indemnity costs - Respondent made calderbank offer - Authority found offer not reasonable - Indemnity costs not appropriate - Respondent's unsuccessful counterclaim warranted uplift as applicant required to file response but matter not pursued at investigation. Respondent to pay applicant $2,638 contribution towards costs. |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($2,638.75) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | High Court Rules r14.2(f) |
| Cases Cited | Bluestar Print Group NZ Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NZCA 385;Bradbury v Westpac Banking Corporation [2009] NZCA 234, [2009] 3 NZLR 400;Knight v Printek Supplies Ltd t/a Datatek Pacific [2014] NZERA Auckland 470;Mattingly v Strata Title Management Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 15, [2014] ERNZ 1 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2015_NZERA_Auckland_78.pdf [pdf 145 KB] |