| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2015] NZERA Wellington 38 |
| Hearing date | 3 Feb 2015 |
| Determination date | 10 April 2015 |
| Member | G J Wood |
| Representation | J Bates ; D McLeod |
| Location | Napier |
| Parties | Wray v Averill Moore Investments t/a Amil Service |
| Summary | UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by change to shift pattern without consultation - Customer service / sales representative |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND -;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE: Applicant had clear shift pattern over many months. Significant changes to applicant's rostered days and hours required consultation. Consultation over applicant's objections to new roster took place early enough. Applicant's concerns considered genuinely. Reconsideration cured initial failure to consult when roster drafted. No unjustified disadvantage. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Personal Grievance |
| Cases Cited | Faapito v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections [2012] NZEmpC 206, (2012) 10 NZELR 604;Rankin v Attorney-General in respect of the State Services Commissioner (No 2) [2001] ERNZ 746 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | 2015_NZERA_Wellington_38.pdf [pdf 201 KB] |