Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 109
Hearing date 23 Feb 2015
Determination date 14 April 2015
Member TG Tetitaha
Representation D Flaws ; D Takitimu
Location Auckland
Parties Smith-Hughes v Te Whanau O Hato Petera Trust
Summary ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay – Whether employment agreement (“EA”) contained clause allowing applicant to determine amount of overtime and amount of pay for overtime - Whether applicant reasonably required by respondent or requirements of job to do overtime - Kaiarataki-programme leader
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY: EA contained clause stating respondent could reasonably require applicant to do overtime, but did not allow applicant to decide amount of overtime or level of pay for overtime. Respondent had not asked applicant to do overtime and had told applicant pre-approval needed for overtime. Respondent had not required applicant to do overtime for disputed hours. Applicant did unnecessary duties and took excessive time to do required duties. Not reasonably necessary for applicant to do overtime to properly perform duties. No arrears of wages. Respondent accepted holiday pay owed to applicant. Respondent to pay applicant $523 arrears of holiday pay.
Result Application partially granted ; Arrears of holiday pay ($523.66) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Arrears
Statutes ERA s131;Holidays Act 2003 s 9
Cases Cited Attorney-General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] UKPC 10, [2009] 1WLR 1988;BP Refinery (Westenport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 (PC);Dysart Timbers Ltd v Nielsen [2009] NZSC 43, [2009] 5 NZLR 160;Gibbston Downs Wines Ltd v Perpetual Trust Ltd [2013] NZCA 506, [2014] NZCCLR 6 ;;Vector Gas v Bay of Plenty Energy Ltd [2010] NZSC 5, [2010] 2 NZLR 444;White v Reserve Bank of New Zealand [2013] NZCA 663, [2013] ERNZ 367
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_109.pdf [pdf 279 KB]