Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2015] NZERA Christchurch 58
Hearing date 31 Mar 2015
Determination date 11 May 2015
Member H Doyle
Representation N McSparron ; S Townsend
Location Christchurch
Parties Williams v Fletcher Construction Co Ltd for the Earthquake Recovery Project
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Applicant accepted money from contractors to do outside work - Whether applicant’s alleged breach of employment agreement (“EA”) regarding acceptance of money constituted serious misconduct – Works Manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Applicant should have known that conduct was improper even if not aware of clause in EA. Fair and reasonable employer could have concluded applicant committed serious misconduct as conduct was of the kind that could destroy trust and confidence. Respondent carried out full and fair investigation, raised concerns sufficiently with applicant, allowed applicant opportunity to comment and considered applicant’s explanation. Dismissal justified.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (No 2) [2011] NZEmpC 160, [2011] ERNZ;Chief Executive of Department of Inland Revenue v Buchanan (No 2) [2005] ERNZ 767 (CA)
Number of Pages 14
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Christchurch_58.pdf [pdf 186 KB]