Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 179
Hearing date 5 Jun 2015
Determination date 22 June 2015
Member A Fitzgibbon
Representation P Wallace ; G Malone
Location Auckland
Parties Davison v Talley's Group Ltd
Summary JURISDICTION – Whether contractual relationship between parties – Whether applicant employee or independent contractor – Triangular employment relationship - General Manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –JURISDICTION: Parties intended contract to be contract for services, not employment agreement. Contract stated between respondent and applicant’s company. Applicant signed contract on behalf of own company. No contractual relationship between applicant and respondent. In any case, applicant aware of differences between employment and independent contractor agreements. Applicant’s company paid own tax and did own accounting. Applicant worked exclusively for respondent but had to provide own equipment and worked from home. Applicant independent contractor. No jurisdiction.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Jurisdiction
Statutes ERA s6;ERA s174
Cases Cited Bryson v Three Foot Six Ltd (No 2) [2005] NZSC 34, [2005] 3 NZLR 721;Chief of Defence Force v Ross-Taylor [2010] NZEmpC 22, [2010] ERNZ 61; Excell Corp Ltd v Carmichael [2003] 1 ERNZ 473 (EmpC);Massey v Crown Life Insurance Co [1977] EWCA Civ 12, [1978] All ER 576;May v Armourguard Security Ltd [2011] NZERA Auckland 208;McDonald v Ontrack Infrastructure Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 132, [2010] ERNZ 223;Poulter v Antipodean Growers Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 77, (2010) 7 NZELR 543;Singh v Eric James & Associates Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 1
Number of Pages 14
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_179.pdf [pdf 268 KB]