Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 199
Hearing date 16 Jun 2015 - 17 Jun 2015 (2 days)
Determination date 02 July 2015
Member E Robinson
Representation K Fayen ; A Schaaf
Location Auckland
Parties Lolohea v The Tongan Health Society Inc
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Nurse
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: No express contractual power to suspend application. Since issues of concern included risk to patients, respondent acted reasonably in proposing suspension. Respondent informed applicant of all concerns in detail with potential consequences and gave applicant opportunity to comment, but applicant failed to do so. Applicant advised of right to have support person present at disciplinary meetings but failed to exercise right in timely manner. Respondent tried to avoid bias by dividing up decisions between decision-makers so that decision-makers did not decide on matters in which they were involved. Fair and reasonable employer could have concluded that applicant’s behaviour in writing and circulating letter containing untrue allegations about respondent, failing to communicate about vaccinations, exceeding financial authorisation levels in breach of clear instructions and refusing to treat patient, serious misconduct. Dismissal justified.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A;ERA s103A(3);ERA s174
Cases Cited Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd (No 2) [2011] NZEmpC 160, [2011] ERNZ 466;Graham v Airways Corporation of New Zealand [2005] ERNZ 587 (EmpC);Ministry of Maori Development v Travers-Jones [2003] 1 ERNZ 174 (EmpC);Sefo v Sealord Shellfish Ltd [2008] ERNZ 178 (EmpC);Tawhiwhairangi v Attorney-General Justice [1993] 2 ERNZ 546 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 25
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_199.pdf [pdf 263 KB]