| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2015] NZERA Auckland 89 |
| Determination date | 25 March 2015 |
| Member | TG Tetitaha |
| Representation | J Won ; No appearance |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Tao v Chen |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for urgency without notice – Respondent sold business after applicant raised personal grievance – Applicant sought to freeze respondent’s assets |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Applicant did not appear to have considered other remedies available. Applicant delayed application for urgency for three months. Respondent’s right to natural justice greater than applicant’s need for urgency. Application for urgency dismissed. |
| Result | Application dismissed |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s157;ERA s157(2)(a) |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2015_NZERA_Auckland_89.pdf [pdf 84 KB] |