Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 231
Hearing date 5 Aug 2015
Determination date 05 August 2015
Member R Larmer
Representation J Prins (in person) ; J Viall
Location Auckland
Parties Prins v JAE Sales Ltd
Summary PENALTY – Applicant sought penalties for respondent’s failure to provide written employment agreement (EA), failure to keep accurate leave and holiday records and failure to provide records on request – Butcher
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;PENALTY: Respondent admitted failure to provide written EA. Applicant’s claim failed because s65(4) Employment Relations Act 2000 requires that Labour Inspector to bring penalty action. Applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to prove respondent failed to keep records. Respondent failed to provide access to records on request. Failure taken into account in applicant’s earlier claim for arrears of wages. No separate remedy or penalty for such failure. No penalty.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs to lie where they fall
Main Category Penalty
Statutes ERA s65(4);Holidays Act 2003 s82;Holidays Act 2003 s83
Cases Cited Prins v Jae Sales Ltd [2013] NZERA Auckland 489;Prins v Jae Sales Ltd [2015] NZERA Auckland 150
Number of Pages 4
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_231.pdf [pdf 135 KB]