Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2015] NZERA Wellington 81
Hearing date 30-Apr-15
Determination date 24 August 2015
Member Michele Ryan
Representation B Laracy ; P Wilson
Location Wellington
Parties Rameka v GnomeFarmer Painters Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Poor Performance - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – 90 day trial period – Summary dismissal - Whether respondent able to cancel employment agreement (“EA”) on basis of applicant’s representations about experience - PENALTY – GOOD FAITH – Applicant sought penalties for respondent’s breach of good faith and failure to provide wage and time records – Painter
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: No written EA between parties, so 90 day trial period not applicable. Respondent unable to justify dismissal on basis of trial period. Respondent able to cancel EA on basis of misrepresentation about experience, but respondent failed to prove existence of misrepresentations. Even if respondent had proven misrepresentations occurred, good faith requirements would prevent respondent from summarily dismissing applicant. Respondent unable to dismiss applicant for poor performance because respondent failed to raise concerns with applicant. Respondent unable to claim applicant employed on fixed term as no EA so no compliance with requirements for written agreement of fixed term contracts. Respodnent failed to put concerns to applicant, allow applicant opportunity to respond and consider explanations. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $2,844 reimbursement of lost wages. $2,500 compensation appropriate.PENALTY: Applicant already compensated for respondent’ breach of good faith so no need to order penalty. Failure to provide wage and time records inadvertent. No penalty.
Result Application granted (unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($2,844) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($2,500) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA;ERA s66(4);ERA s67A(2);ERA s67A(3);ERA s103A(2);ERA s128(2);ERA s130(1);Contractual Remedies Act 1979;Contractual Remedies Act 1979 s7(3)
Cases Cited Allen v TransPacific Industries Group Ltd (t/a Media Smart Ltd) (2009) 6 NZELR 530 (EmpC);Tan v Yang [2014] NZEmpC 65;Telecom New Zealand Ltd v Nutter [2004] 1 ERNZ 315 (CA)
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Wellington_81.pdf [pdf 210 KB]