Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 303
Hearing date 29-Sep-15
Determination date 29 September 2015
Member Eleanor Robinson
Representation E Spence (In person) ; no appearance
Location Tauranga
Parties Spence (Labour Inspector) v Tamehana Horticulture Service Ltd
Summary COMPLIANCE ORDER – Applicant sought compliance with Improvement Notice – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s failure to comply with Improvement Notice – COSTS – Applicant sought contribution towards costs - No appearance for respondent
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;COMPLIANCE ORDER: Respondent failed to comply with Improvement Notice by not providing employment agreements, time and wage records and holiday records. Compliance ordered.;PENALTY: Breaches and failure to comply serious. Public policy considerations require employers to act responsibly in adhering to statutory imperatives. $6,000 penalty appropriate.;COSTS: Less than half day investigation meeting. Respondent to pay applicant $300 contribution towards costs.
Result Applications granted ; Orders made ; Penalty ($1,500)(payable to third party)($4,500)(payable to Crown) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($300) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
Main Category Compliance Order
Statutes ERA s136(2);ERA s137(1)(a)(iiib);ERA s223D;ERA s223F;ERA s229;ERA s229(2);ERA Second Schedule cl12;ERA Second Schedule cl15
Cases Cited Tan v Yang [2014] NZEmpC 65
Number of Pages 5
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_303.pdf [pdf 158 KB]