Restrictions Includes non-publication order
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2015] NZERA Christchurch 145
Determination date 07 October 2015
Member Helen Doyle
Representation P Andrew, L Goffin ; R McIlraith, K Dunn
Location Christchurch
Parties Edminstin v Sanford Ltd and Anor
Other Parties Johnson
Summary COUNTERCLAIM – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Second respondent sought to dismiss claims as frivolous or vexatious – Whether Authority able to order compliance order against company person not party to settlement agreement (“SA”)
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;COUNTERCLAIM – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Authority does not have power to make compliance order against person not party to SA. Unlikely that proceedings could be amended to provide tenable cause of action against second respondent. Proceedings frivolous and vexatious. Proceedings against second respondent dismissed.
Result Application granted ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s137;ERA s137(1);ERA s137(1)(a)(iii);ERA s137(2);ERA s138;ERA s149;ERA s149(1);ERA s149(3);ERA s151;ERA s151(1)(a);ERA s151(2)(a);ERA s178;ERA Second Schedule cl12A
Cases Cited Credit Consultants Debt Services NZ Ltd v Wilson (No 2) [2007] ERNZ 205 (EmpC);South Tranz Ltd v Strait Freight Ltd [2007] ERNZ 704 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Christchurch_145.pdf [pdf 155 KB]