Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2015] NZERA Christchurch 164
Hearing date 28-Apr-15
Determination date 02 November 2015
Member M B Loftus
Representation P McBride ; G Downing
Location Nelson
Parties Macnab v Mount Campbell Communications Ltd and Anor
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Incompatibility - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s failure to provide training, support or performance reviews and unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Whether valid fixed term employment agreement (“EA”) – PENALTY – Applicant sought penalties for respondents’ breaches of EA – Account manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Fixed term contract appeared to be used to establish applicant’s suitability for role. No genuine reason under s 66 Employment Relations Act 2000 for fixed term employment. Dismissal unjustified. Applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence of disadvantage. No unjustified disadvantage. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $16,750 reimbursement of lost wages. $10,000 compensation appropriate.;PENALTY: Applicant failed to pursue breaches, so respondent unaware of them. Respondent’s conduct not deliberate or reckless. No penalty.
Result Application granted (unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($16,750) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Applications dismissed (unjustified disadvantage)(penalty)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s66(2)(a);ERA s66(3)(b);ERA s128(2)
Number of Pages 10
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Christchurch_164.pdf [pdf 173 KB]