| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2015] NZERA Auckland 214 |
| Determination date | 21 July 2015 |
| Member | TG Tetitaha |
| Representation | SR Wallace ; P Swarbrick |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Wallace v Titoki Securities Trust |
| Summary | COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance claim – Two day investigation meeting – Respondent sought uplift in daily tariff due to lack of merit in applicant’s claim and applicant’s conduct of case – Applicant sought costs to lie where they fall – Authority found appropriate to apply notional daily tariff – Applicant to pay respondent $7,000 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($7,000) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s159(1)(b) |
| Cases Cited | Mattingly v Strata Title Management Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 15, [2014] ERNZ 1;Open Systems Ltd v Pontiflex [1995] 2 ERNZ 211 (EmpC);PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) ;;Wallis v Titoki Securities Trust [2015] NZERA Auckland 94 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2015_NZERA_Auckland_214.pdf [pdf 145 KB] |