| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2015] NZERA Auckland 399 |
| Determination date | 17 December 2015 |
| Member | Vicki Campbell |
| Representation | K Proctor ; E Chey |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Singh v Compass Group New Zealand Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Unsuccessful personal grievance claim – One day investigation meeting – Respondent sought uplift in notional daily tariff to acknowledge rejected Calderbank offer and applicant’s conduct of case – Authority found appropriate to award decrease in tariff as respondent’s only costs related to salary of in-house representative – Applicant to pay respondent $1,000 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($1,000) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s179;ERA s180 |
| Cases Cited | Blue Star Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NZCA 385, [2010] ERNZ 446;Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Limited [2015] NZEmpC 4;Clarke v Attorney-General in respect of the Secretary of Labour EC Wellington WEC29A/97, 24 October 1997;Dumolo v Lakes District Health Board [2014] NZEmpC 40, (2014) NZELR 493;Mattingly v Strata Title Management Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 15, [2014] ERNZ 1;Open Systems Ltd v Pontifex [1995] 2 ERNZ 211 (EmpC);PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC);Singh v Compass Group New Zealand Ltd [2015] NZERA Auckland 305;Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 28;Tomo v Checkmate Precision Cutting Tools Limited [2015] NZEmpC 2 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | 2015_NZERA_Auckland_399.pdf [pdf 107 KB] |