| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Wellington 7 |
| Determination date | 18 January 2016 |
| Member | Michele Ryan |
| Representation | P McBride ; D Burton, A Espie |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Shoshany v 4RF Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Successful personal grievance claim and unsuccessful penalty claim – Two day investigation meeting – Applicant sought uplift in daily tariff – Applicant rejected two Calderbank offers but Authority awarded more than sum offers – Authority found appropriate to apply notional daily tariff – Respondent to pay applicant $7000 contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($7000) ; Disbursements ($71.56)(Filing Fee) ($3800)(Travel) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Air New Zealand ltd v Kerr [2013] EmpC 237;Fagotti v ACME & Co Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135;New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union v New Zealand Fire Service Commission EmpC Wellington WC9A/08, 3 October 2008;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] 1 ERNZ 808;RHB Chartered Accountants Ltd v Rawcliffe [2012] NZEmpC 31;Shoshany v 4RF Limited [2015] NZERA Wellington 63 |
| Number of Pages | 6 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Wellington_7.pdf [pdf 227 KB] |