| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Wellington 18 |
| Determination date | 09 February 2016 |
| Member | Michael Loftus |
| Representation | P Cranney ; G Davenport |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Heeley v Board of Trustees Chilton St James School |
| Summary | DISPUTE – Parties disputed interpretation of prorate provision in Collective Employment Agreement (“CEA”) with Holidays Act 2003 (“HA”) – School support worker |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –;DISPUTE: CEA’s prorate provision reduced HA entitlement to annual leave. Provision unenforceable. Question answered in favour of applicant. |
| Result | Question answered in favour of applicant ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Dispute |
| Statutes | Holidays Act 2003 s5;Holidays Act 2003 s6(3);Holidays Act 2003 s16(1);Holidays Act 2003 s17(1);Holidays Act 2003 s21 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Wellington_18.pdf [pdf 154 KB] |