Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 57
Hearing date 15-Dec-14
Determination date 23 February 2015
Member James Crichton
Representation RM Flett (in person) ; M Quigg
Location Auckland
Parties Flett v Higgins Coating Pty Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s failure to respond to health and safety concerns and unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Misrepresentation of qualifications – ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay – Painter
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE - UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL : Respondent properly engaged with applicant over health and safety concerns and took appropriate steps to minimise rise. No disadvantage. Applicant did not have necessary skills for role and was aware of that. Applicant’s employment agreement (“EA”) provided the disciplinary action can result if representations are false. EA required employee to perform duties. Applicant and respondent agreed to termination of employment at meeting. Dismissal justified.;ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY : Applicant owed money for final week’s work. Respondent to pay applicant arrears of wages and holiday pay, quantum to be determined
Result Application granted (arrears of wages and holiday pay); Arrears of wages and holiday pay (quantum to be determined) ; Application dismissed (unjustified disadvantage - unjustified dismissal) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Number of Pages 11
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_57.pdf [pdf 166 KB]