Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 248
Hearing date 2 & 3 Jun 2015 (2 days)
Determination date 17 August 2015
Member James Crichton
Representation M Beech ; A Bennett
Location Tauranga
Parties Graham v KMA Group Ltd t/a Knockout Sportswear
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by respondent’s persistent contact during leave – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed – Sales representative
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Although applicant misled respondent about leave taken, respondent had obligation to clarify precise leave requested. Good and fair employer could not expect employee to be available on day of requested and granted leave. Applicant unjustifiably disadvantaged. Dismissal substantively justified as applicant misled respondent about why leave taken. Respondent conducted fair investigation and disciplinary process. Dismissal justified. REMEDIES: 20 per cent contributory conduct. $8,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted (unjustified disadvantage) ; Contributory conduct (20%) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($8,000) ; Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s122;ERA s123(1)(c)(i)
Number of Pages 20
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_248.pdf [pdf 214 KB]