Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2015] NZERA Auckland 310
Determination date 02 October 2015
Member Robin Arthur
Representation B Davis (in person) ; J Deo
Location Auckland
Parties Davis v Payless Print Ltd
Summary PENALTY – Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s breach of settlement agreement
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –PENALTY: Respondent had adequate opportunity to respond and be involved, but did not. Respondent had not paid outstanding wages and holiday pay owed to applicant. Applicant denied use of money entitled to under terms of settled agreement. Breach deliberate. Respondent showed no remorse. Deterrence necessary. $2,000 penalty appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Penalty ($2,000)(payable to applicant) ; No order for costs
Main Category Penalty
Statutes ERA s133;ERA s135(2)(b);ERA s136(2);ERA s149;ERA s174D
Cases Cited Davis v Payless Print Ltd [2015] NZERA Auckland 277;Xu v McIntosh [2004] 2 ERNZ 448 (EmpC);Tan v Yang [2014] NZEmpC 65, [2014] ERNZ 733
Number of Pages 4
PDF File Link: 2015_NZERA_Auckland_310.pdf [pdf 97 KB]