| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Wellington 45 |
| Hearing date | 11-Apr-16 |
| Determination date | 11 April 2016 |
| Member | Michael Loftus |
| Representation | no appearance ; A McIlroy |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Kundu v Smith (Labour Inspector) |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant objected to Improvement Notice given by respondent – No appearance for applicant |
| Abstract | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant objected to Improvement Notice given by respondent – No appearance for applicant;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Question whether application valid as employer not named as applicant. Application not filed in time. Appeared that employer had failed to comply with minimum standards. Objection dismissed. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s221(c);ERA s223D;ERA s223E;ERA s223E(1);ERA s223(2);Minimum Wage Act 1983 |
| Cases Cited | Brook v Macown [2014] NZEmpC 79, [2014] ERNZ 639;G L Freeman Holdings Ltd v Livingston [2015] NZEmpC 120;Salad Bowl Ltd v Howe-Thornley [2013] NZEmpC 152, [2013] ERNZ 326 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Wellington_45.pdf [pdf 97 KB] |