| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Auckland 90 |
| Determination date | 22 March 2016 |
| Member | Tania Tetitaha |
| Representation | EK Eriksson (in person) ; MJ Robinson |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Eriksson v Provision Security Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Dismissed compliance order claim - No investigation meeting – Applicant sought contribution to costs – No basis for costs to be awarded given no hearing or compliance order required – Costs to lie where they fall |
| Result | Costs to lie where they fall |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s149;ERA s174C(3)(b);ERA s174C(4) |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Auckland_90.pdf [pdf 139 KB] |