Restrictions Includes non-publication order
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2016] NZERA Christchurch 52
Hearing date 29 Feb & 1 Mar 2016 (2 days)
Determination date 26 April 2016
Member David Appleton
Representation S Boele, L Taylor ; G Ballara
Location Timaru
Parties MacKay v Spotless Facility Services (NZ) Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Order for non-publication of names of respondent’s staff. Respondent potentially failed in duty to investigate applicant’s complaints, but applicant unaware of this so could not have led to resignation. Applicant did not affirm breaches by asking to put resignation on hold because applicant was asking for urgent resolution to concerns. Respondent failed in duty of good faith by not investigating further complaints or advising applicant that would do so. Failure to do so significantly causative of applicant’s resignation. Reasonably foreseeable that applicant would resign. Applicant constructively dismissed. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $8,001 reimbursement of lost wages. $7,500 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($8,001.70) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($7,500) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s103A;ERA s124;ERA s128;Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992
Cases Cited Auckland Electric Power Board v Auckland Provincial District Local Authorities Officers Industrial Union of Workers Inc [1994] 2 NZLR 415 (CA);Auckland Shop Employees IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] 2 NZLR 372 (CA)
Number of Pages 24
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_52.pdf [pdf 314 KB]