Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2016] NZERA Auckland 164
Hearing date 25-May-16
Determination date 25 May 2016
Member Tania Tetitaha
Representation D Vinnicombe ; L Budge
Location Auckland
Parties Spencer v Te Anua Nua Trust
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Summary dismissal - COSTS – Applicant sought contribution to costs – Support worker
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent failed to follow clear disciplinary procedure as required by employment agreement. Reasonable employer would have done so. Applicant unjustifiably dismissed. REMEDIES: 50 per cent contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant reimbursement of lost wages, quantum to be determined. $3,000 compensation appropriate.;COSTS: Half day investigation meeting. Appropriate to apply notional daily tariff. Respondent to pay applicant $1,750 contribution to costs.
Result Application granted ; Contributory conduct (50%) ; Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Costs in favour of applicant ($1,750) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee)
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A;ERA s103A(3);ERA s103A(5);ERA s124;ERA s128
Cases Cited Allen v TransPacific Industries Group Ltd (t/a Media Smart Ltd) (2009) 6 NZELR 530 (EmpC); Angus v Ports of Auckland Ltd [2011] NZEmpC 160, [2011] ERNZ 466;Finau v Carter Holt Building Supplies [1993] 2 ERNZ 971 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 7
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Auckland_164.pdf [pdf 240 KB]