Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2016] NZERA Auckland 168
Determination date 27 May 2016
Member Robin Arthur
Representation J Turner ; P Finnigan, B van Delden, G Pollak
Location Auckland
Parties Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd (in Liquidation) and Ors
Other Parties Teague, West Management Ltd
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Authority considered removal of matter to Employment Court (“EC”) on own motion - Whether important question of law likely to arise, EC already had before it proceedings between same parties involving same or similar issues, and in all circumstances matter should be determined by EC.
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Wider issues of jurisdiction and equity raised by applicants claim. Issue over personal liability for director over breach of consent determination and settlement agreement. Arguably important question of law likely to arise and EC already had before it proceedings between same parties involving same or similar issues. In all circumstances matter should be determined by EC. Matter removed to EC.
Result Application granted ; No order for costs
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes Companies Act 1993 s248 - Companies Act 1993 s248(1) - Companies Act 1993 s248(1)(c)(i) - Companies Act 1993 s248(1)(c)(ii) - ERA s178(1) - ERA s178(2)(a) - ERA s178(2)(c) - ERA s178(2)(d) - ERA s178(5) - ERA s190(3)
Cases Cited Auckland District Health Board v X (No 2) [2005] ERNZ 551 (EmpC);Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 18;Harlow v Western Property Management Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 119
Number of Pages 6
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Auckland_168.pdf [pdf 185 KB]