Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2016] NZERA Christchurch 77
Determination date 09 June 2016
Member David Appleton
Representation G Kelly ; J G Dykhoff (in person)
Location Christchurch
Parties Labour Inspector v Dykhoff
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Applicant sought to bring claim against respondent personally
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Company against whom original judgment given in liquidation. Company unlikely to be able to pay in full. Respondent not director of company but evidence indicated respondent effectively running company. Respondent took part in Authority proceedings before liquidation. Respondent managed employees and paid them. Respondent officer of company. Leave to bring claim personally granted.
Result Application granted ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s137;ERA s223C;ERA s234;Employment Relations Amendment Act 2016 s35;Employment Relations Amendment Act 2016 Schedule 1AA cl3(7)
Cases Cited Macrury v Cypress Villas Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 157
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_77.pdf [pdf 173 KB]