Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2016] NZERA Wellington 69
Hearing date 8 & 9 Mar 2016 (2 days)
Determination date 16 June 2016
Member Trish MacKinnon
Representation M Richards, A Chote ; G Brant
Location Wellington
Parties Sunder v Vasona Networks Inc
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent had genuine business reasons for redundancy due to lack of sales. Respondent failed to provide applicant with all relevant information. Fair and reasonable employer could not rely on applicant’s assumed knowledge of financial information. Respondent led applicant to believe whole operation shut down in region, but some employees redeployed. Applicant not offered redeployment. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. $10,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($10,000) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4;ERA s4(1A);ERA s103A;ERA s125;ERA s126;ERA s174E(b)(i)
Cases Cited Rittson-Thomas t/a Totara Hills Farm v Davidson [2013] NZEmpC 39, [2013] ERNZ 55
Number of Pages 11
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Wellington_69.pdf [pdf 234 KB]