| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Christchurch 100 |
| Determination date | 29 June 2016 |
| Member | David Appleton |
| Representation | J Horan ; P Rea |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Nguyen v Ta & Anor |
| Other Parties | Little Saigon Nails and Beauticians Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Withdrawal of claims – No investigation meeting - Respondents sought contribution to costs – Not appropriate to apply notional daily tariff since no investigation meeting - Applicant to pay respondents $4,921 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondents ($4,921) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl11 |
| Cases Cited | JP Morgan Chase Bank NA v Lewis [2015] NZCA 255, [2015] 3 NZLR 618;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_100.pdf [pdf 160 KB] |