| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Auckland 225 |
| Determination date | 05 July 2016 |
| Member | Rachel Larmer |
| Representation | S Blick ; S Sharma |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Labour Inspector v Sharmas & Sons (2009) Ltd and Anor |
| Other Parties | Sharmas & Sons Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Successful arrears and penalty claims – 5 day investigation meeting – Appropriate to apply notional daily tariff – First respondent to pay applicant $10,500 contribution to costs and second respondent to pay applicant $7,000 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($10,500)(first respondent)($7,000)(second respondent) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($204.28)(first respondent) ($204.28)(second respondent) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Feeney v Sharmas & Sons (2009) Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 169;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Auckland_225.pdf [pdf 94 KB] |