Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2016] NZERA Wellington 75
Hearing date 7-Apr-16
Determination date 05 July 2016
Member Michael Loftus
Representation R Ward ; S Graham, D Graham
Location Whanganui
Parties Costa v Opawa Properties Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Waitress/receptionist
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent entitled to raise concerns with applicant. Applicant’s evidence did not support claims that warning given or that applicant frequently required to act as duty manager in breach of statutory requirements. Flexible and variable hours part of arrangement between parties. Respondents tried to retain applicant. No evidence that respondent engaged in course of conduct designed to force applicant to resign. No dismissal.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs to lie where they fall
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4(1A)(b) ; Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 s 229(2) ; Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 s 229(3) ; Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 s 230 ; Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012 s 231(3)
Cases Cited Auckland Shop Employees IUOW v Woolworths (NZ) Ltd [1985] 2 NZLR 372 (CA) ; Fredericks v VIP Frames and Trusses Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 203 ; Wellington, Taranaki and Marlborough Clerical Administration and Related Workers IUOW v Greenwich t/a Becket Employment [1983] ACJ 965 (AC) ; Weston v Advkit Para Legal Services Ltd [2010] NZEmpC 140 ; Z v Y Ltd and A [1993] 2 ERNZ 469 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 9
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Wellington_75.pdf [pdf 173 KB]