Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2016] NZERA Wellington 88
Determination date 26 July 2016
Member Trish MacKinnon
Representation A Weir (In Person); C Needham (In Person); J Brothwell (In Person); J Heggarty (In Person); S Langton; R Mcfadyen (In Person); D Burton
Parties Weir & Ors v Corporate Consumables Ltd
Other Parties Needham; Brothwell; Heggarty; Hastings; Schollum; McFadyen
Summary PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Fifth and sixth applicants sought removal of matter to Employment Court (“EC”) on ground important question of law likely to arise – Whether “unless the context otherwise requires” in section 14 Holidays Act 2003 excludes commission payments when calculating gross earnings
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Phrase “unless the context otherwise requires” not yet considered by NZ courts and could have wider implications. Important question of law likely to arise. Matter removed to EC.
Result Application granted ; Costs reserved
Main Category Practice & Procedure
Statutes ERA s174D(2);ERA s174D(3);ERA s178;ERA s178(2)(a);Holidays Act 2003 s5;Holidays Act 2003 s8;Holidays Act 2003 s9;Holidays Act 2003 s14;Holidays Act 2003 s21;ECA s94;Wages Protection Act 1983 s2;Wages Protection Act 1983 s11
Cases Cited Auckland District Health Board v X (No 2) [2005] ERNZ 551 (EmpC);Hanlon v International Educational Foundation (NZ) Inc [1995] 1 ERNZ 1 (EmpC);Hixon v Campbell [2014] NZEmpC 213, [2014] ERNZ 535
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: 2016_ NZERA_ Wellington_88.pdf [pdf 112 KB]