Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2016] NZERA Auckland 93
Determination date 23 March 2016
Member Andrew Dallas
Representation S Parry ; E Davies, H Dymond-Cate
Parties First Union Inc & Anor v Smith & Davies Ltd
Other Parties Henry & Others
Summary DISPUTE – Parties disputed interpretation of clause in collective employment agreement (“CEA”) regarding notice of termination of employment – ARREARS OF WAGES – Applicant sought arrears of wages
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –;DISPUTE: Sub-clauses read in conjunction meant that employees would “normally” receive two weeks’ notice, except in circumstances of abandonment or dismissal for serious misconduct, which are only exceptions to rule. Clear from plain words and structure that clauses intended to be read together. Respondent required to give two weeks’ notice for redundancies. Question answered in favour of applicant.;ARREARS OF WAGES: Respondent failed to pay two weeks’ wages in lieu of notice in accordance with CEA. Respondent to pay former employees arrears of wages, quantum to be determined.
Result Application granted (arrears of wages) ; Question answered in favour of applicant ; Arrears of wages (quantum to be determined) ; No order for costs
Main Category Dispute
Statutes ERA s103A;ERA s174D
Cases Cited Aoraki Corp Ltd v McGavin [1998] 3 NZLR 276 (CA);Charta Packaging Ltd v Howard [2002] 1 ERNZ 10 (CA);Eagle v Flight Centre (NZ) Ltd ERA Auckland AA123/10, 16 March 2010;Grace Team Accounting Ltd v Brake [2014] NZCA 541, [2015] 2 NZLR 494;New Zealand Professional Firefighters Union v New Zealand Fire Services Commission [2011] NZEmpC 149;Ogilvy & Mather (New Zealand) Ltd v Turner [1996] 1 NZLR 641 (CA);Silver Fern Farms Ltd v New Zealand Meat Workers and Related Trades Union Inc [2010] NZCA 317, [2010] ERNZ 317;Vector Gas Ltd v Bay of Plenty Energy Ltd [2010] NZSC 5, [2010] 2 NZLR 444
Number of Pages 11
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Auckland_93.pdf [pdf 194 KB]