Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch
Reference No [2016] NZERA Christchurch 138
Hearing date 26/05/2016
Determination date 22 August 2016
Member Christine Hickey
Representation K Murray; D Beck
Location Christchurch
Parties Mooar v Pennylane Records Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Redundancy - Applicant claimed unjustifiably disadvantaged by failure to work out notice period – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – PENALTY – GOOD FAITH - Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s failure to provide written employment agreement, failure to provide wages and time records and breach of good faith – Store manager
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Redundancy for genuine reasons. Respondent made genuine attempt to consult, but failed to provide relevant financial information regarding need for redundancy and proper opportunity for applicant to provide feedback. Dismissal unjustified. Respondent unilaterally withdrew offer for applicant to work notice period. Applicant unjustifiably disadvantaged. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant reimbursement of lost wages, quantum to be determined. $4,000 compensation appropriate.PENALTY – GOOD FAITH: Respondent failed to provide wages and time record on request but breach inadvertent and remorse expressed. Respondent’s failure to provide relevant information not deliberate. Respondent admitted failure to provide written employment agreement. Breach serious and affected applicant’s understanding of situation surrounding redundancy. Breach one-off. Need for deterrence. $1,000 penalty appropriate.
Result Applications granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages (quantum to be determined) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($4,000) ; Penalty ($1,000)(payable to Crown) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s4 ; ERA s65 ; ERA s128 ; ERA s174E
Cases Cited Grace Team Accounting Ltd v Brake [2014] NZCA 541, [2015] 2 NZLR 494 ; Scarborough v Micron Securities Products Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 39 ; Tan v Yang [2014] NZEmpC 65, [2014] ERNZ 733
Number of Pages 19
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_138.pdf [pdf 221 KB]