Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2016] NZERA Auckland 315
Hearing date 14-Sep-16
Determination date 14 September 2016
Member T Tetitaha
Representation K Taurau ; S Bliss
Location Auckland
Parties Palmco Garden Ltd v Welch and Anor
Other Parties Welch
Summary PENALTY - Applicant sought penalty for respondent’s breach of settlement agreement – Whether ex-employee’s partner made disparaging remarks about applicant to third party
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND -PENALTY: Ex-employee unaware of partner’s conversation with third party and did not breach settlement agreement. Partner told third party that ex-employee laid off by applicant for no reason. Partner breached settlement agreement by making disparaging comment about applicant. Breach a one-off and inadvertent. No pre-determined motive. Some comments were truth and in public domain. Deterrence best served by publication of decision. No penalty.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Penalty
Statutes ERA s134(2) - ERA s135(4) - ERA s140
Cases Cited Musa v Whanganui District Health Board [2010] NZEmpC 120, [2010] ERNZ 236
Number of Pages 8
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Auckland_315.pdf [pdf 163 KB]