Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2016] NZERA Auckland 314
Hearing date 24-May-16
Determination date 15 September 2016
Member N Craig
Representation W Reid ; A Ireland (in person)
Location Hamilton
Parties Ottesen v Ireland and Anor
Other Parties Ireland
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Constructive Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY – Applicant sought arrears of wages and holiday pay – Deductions from wages - Truck driver
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent’s son had ostensible authority to act on behalf of respondents. Respondents wanted applicant to keep working for them. Applicant did not like staying away from family. Applicant resigned of own volition. No dismissal.ARREARS OF WAGES AND HOLIDAY PAY: Deductions not made in accordance with employment agreement and no evidence of applicant requesting deductions. Respondent to pay applicant $289 arrears of wages and $23 arrears of holiday pay.
Result Application granted (arrears of wages and holiday pay) ; Arrears of wages ($289.94) ; Arrears of holiday pay ($23.20) ; Application dismissed (unjustified dismissal) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s124 ; ERA s174E ; Wages Protection Act 1983 s4 ; Wages Protection Act 1983 s5(1) ; Wages Protection Amendment Act 2016
Cases Cited Clark v Nelson Marlborough District Health Board [2002] 2 ERNZ 483 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 16
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Auckland_314.pdf [pdf 215 KB]