| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Christchurch 158 |
| Determination date | 19 September 2016 |
| Member | C Hickey |
| Representation | K Harding ; K van Wijngaarden |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Hartono and Ors v Sajo Oyang Corporation |
| Other Parties | Wahyono, Akmadi, Abduladis, Ropi'I, Santoso, Unwanulloh |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Transfer of proceedings – Applicants sought transfer of proceedings to Auckland |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Events giving rise to problem occurred nearest, by most convenient route, to Christchurch. No reason to exercise discretion to transfer proceedings. Application for transfer dismissed. |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s3 ; EAR R13(1) ; EAR R13(2) ; Fisheries Act 1996 s103A |
| Cases Cited | Department of Labour (Immigration Service) v Kamo ERA Auckland AA74/04, 3 March 2004 ; Eardley v Conqueror International Ltd [2014] NZERA Auckland 416 |
| Number of Pages | 8 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_158.pdf [pdf 129 KB] |