| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Christchurch 164 |
| Determination date | 21 September 2016 |
| Member | P van Keulen |
| Representation | C Gordon ; L Penno |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Hauraki-Tumu v North Canterbury Distributors (2003) Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Partially successful personal grievance claim - One day investigation meeting- Respondent sought contribution to costs - Appropriate to reverse costs burden due to Calderbank offers unreasonably rejected by applicant - Appropriate to apply notiondal daily tariff - Applicant to pay respondent $3,500 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($3,500) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Blue Star Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NZCA 385, [2010] ERNZ 446 ; Fagotti v Acme Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135 ; Hauraki-Tumu v North Canterbury Distributors (2013) Ltd [2016] NZERA Christchurch 97 ; Ogilvy & Mather (NZ) Ltd v Darroch [1993] 2 ERNZ 943 (EmpC) ; PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) ; Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 28 |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_164.pdf [pdf 161 KB] |