| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Christchurch 194 |
| Determination date | 28 October 2016 |
| Member | E Robinson |
| Representation | J Goldstein ; N McPhail |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Watson v Ashburton District Council |
| Summary | JURISDICTION - Whether parties engaged in bargaining process - Applicant claimed respondent attempting to unilaterally alter work hours |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND - Respondent did not propose to unilaterally change methodology used to determine applicant’s salary. Respondent made an offer which, if accepted, may alter hours. No dispute between parties. Parties engaged in bargaining. No jurisdiction |
| Result | Application dismissed ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Jurisdiction |
| Statutes | ERA s129(1) - ERA s161(1)(b) - ERA s161(2) |
| Cases Cited | Canterbury Spinners Ltd v Vaughan [2003] 1 NZLR 176 (CA) |
| Number of Pages | 9 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_194.pdf [pdf 174 KB] |