Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2016] NZERA Wellington 135
Hearing date 1 Mar 2016 - 3 Mar 2016 (3 days)
Determination date 07 November 2016
Member Michele Ryan
Representation G Dewar ; L Brown
Location Napier
Parties McDermott v Prestige Ltd
Summary RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE – Whether grievance raised within 90 days – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Privilege – Whether privilege attaches to emails between applicant and lay advocate - UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Dismissal – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by use of private email – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Quality Assessor
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –RAISING PERSONAL GRIEVANCE: Applicant did not raise personal grievance about failure to provide safe workplace regarding depot accommodation until 6 months later. Grievance not raised within 90 days.PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Privilege does not extend to communications between person and lay applicant in forum outside confines of proceedings before Authority or Court.UNJUSTIFIED DISADVANTAGE – UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent’s use of email not breach of confidence. Email revealed possible breach of good faith by applicant so respondent within rights to make inquiries. No unjustified disadvantage. Resignation not made in heat of moment. Respondent not able to rely on notice of resignation as cause for termination of employment as respondent had advised it would defer acceptance of resignation. Respondent actually dismissed applicant. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: No contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $11,158 reimbursement of lost wages. $3,000 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted (unjustified dismissal) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ( $11,158.64) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($3,000) ; Applications dismissed (raising personal grievance)(practice and procedure)(unjustified disadvantage) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s114(1) ; ERA s114(3) ; ERA s114(4) ; ERA s128(2) ; ERA s148 ; ERA Second Schedule cl3 ; Evidence Act 2006 s51(1) ; Evidence Act 2006 s56 ; Evidence Act 2006 s56 ; Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 s6
Cases Cited Austin v Silver Fern Farms Ltd [2014] NZEmpC 30 ; Boobyer v Good Health Wanganui Ltd EmpC Wellington WEC3/94, 24 February 1994 ; Dormer v Hanger Company Ltd [2003] 2 ERNZ 89 (EmpC) ; Hunt v A [2007] NZCA 332 ; Priest v Prestidge Ltd [2016] NZERA Wellington 134
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Wellington_135.pdf [pdf 397 KB]