| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Wellington 143 |
| Determination date | 25 November 2016 |
| Member | M Loftus |
| Representation | A Porter ; H Fuimaono, M Fuimaono |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Houia v Nga Taonga Tuku Iho I Te Wa Kainga (NTTI) and Ors |
| Other Parties | Fuimaono, Fuimaono |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful personal grievance and arrears claims - Half day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $4,500 contribution to costs - Appropriate to uplift notional daily tariff to reflect limited participation by respondents - Second and third respondents to pay applicant $3,500 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($3,500) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Fagotti v Acme Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135, (2015) NZELR 1 ; Houia v Nga Taonga Tuku Iho i Te Wa Kainga (NTTI) [2016] NZERA Wellington 126 ; PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) ; Sandilands v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections ERA Wellington WA67/09, 10 September 2009 ; Swales v AFFCO New Zealand Ltd EMpC Auckland AC19/01, 23 March 2001 |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy. |