| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Christchurch 218 |
| Determination date | 09 December 2016 |
| Member | P van Keulen |
| Representation | L Acland ; K Radich |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Slotemaker v The New Zealand King Salmon Co. Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful breach of contract claim - Les than one day investigation meeting - Applicant sought $7,000 contribution to costs - Appropriate to apply notional daily tariff - Respondent to pay applicant $3,000 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($3,000) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Cases Cited | Argosy Imports Ltd v Lineham [1998] 3 ERNZ 976 (EmpC) ; Blue Star Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NZCA 385, [2010] ERNZ 446 ; Booth v Big Kahuna Holdings Limited [2015] NZEmpC 4 ; Fagotti v Acme Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135, (2015) NZELR 1 ; Maritime Union of New Zealand Inc v TLNZ Ltd [2008] ERNZ 91 (EmpC) ; Ogilvy & Mather (NZ) Ltd v Darroch [1993] 2 ERNZ 943 (EmpC) ; PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) ; Sandilands v Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections ERA Wellington WA67A/09, 10 September 2009 ; Slotemaker v The New Zealand King Salmon Co Ltd [2016] NZERA Christchurch 173 ; Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 28 ; Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 (CA) |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Christchurch_218.pdf [pdf 110 KB] |