| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Wellington |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Wellington 155 |
| Determination date | 16 December 2016 |
| Member | M Ryan |
| Representation | N Duffy (in person), M Speight (in person) ; G Ballara |
| Location | Wellington |
| Parties | Duffy and Anor v CGML Ltd and Anor |
| Other Parties | Speight, Willis Street Parking Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Unsuccessful contribution to costs - More than two day investigation meeting - Respondents sought $30,000 contribution to costs - Appropriate to uplift notional daily tariff to recognise unreasonably rejected Calderbank offers - Applicants to pay respondent $12,500 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($7,500)(first applicant)($5,000)(second applicant) ; Disbursements in favour of respondent ($47.42)(first applicant)($47.42)(second applicant) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Blue Star Print Group (NZ) Ltd v Mitchell [2010] NZCA 385, [2010] ERNZ 446 ; Duffy v CGML Ltd [2016] NZERA Wellington 80 ; PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) ; Stevens v Hapag-Lloyd (NZ) Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 28 |
| Number of Pages | 5 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016_NZERA_Wellington_155.pdf [pdf 323 KB] |