Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2016] NZERA Auckland 420
Hearing date 9-Dec-16
Determination date 23 December 2016
Member E Robinson
Representation S Blick ; G Bennett
Location Auckland
Parties Labour Inspector v Neelam Ahuja, Chirag Ahuja and Rhythm Ahuja (Re Khoobsurat Ltd) (in Liquidation) and Ors
Other Parties Naari Collection Ltd (in Liquidation) and Neelam Ahuja and Chirag Ahuja, Khoobsurat Collections Ltd (in Liquidation) and Neelam Ahuja and Chirag Ahuja
Summary PENALTY – Authority sought to award penalty on own motion for obstructing or delaying Authority investigation AUTHORITY FOUND –
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –PENALTY: Authority investigation obstructed by unnecessary and undue pressure placed on witnesses in giving evidence. Respondents responsible for that pressure being applied and subverted or pre-empted effective application of dispute resolution process in this case. Actions serious. Need for deterrence. $20,000 penalty for each respondent appropriate. Respondent’s actions possible contempt of Authority, so determination given to Solicitor-General.
Result Application granted ; Penalty ($10,000)(payable to witnesses)($10,000)(payable to Crown)(first respondent) ($10,000)(payable to witnesses)($10,000)(payable to Crown)(second respondent) ($10,000)(payable to witnesses)($10,000)(payable to Crown)(third respondent)
Main Category Penalty
Statutes ERA s133A ; ERA s134A ; ERA s136(2) ; ERA s142S ; ERA s181
Cases Cited Borsboom v Preet Pvt Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 143 ; Ho v Chief of Defence Force [2005] ERNZ 93 (EmpC) ; Labour Inspector v Ahuja [2016] NZERA Auckland 400 ; Radius Residential Care Ltd v New Zealand Nurses Organisation Inc [2016] NZEmpC 112 ; Tan v Yang [2014] NZEmpC 65, [2014] ERNZ 733 ; United Foods IUOW v Talley [1992] 1 ERNZ 756 (LC) ; Xu v McIntosh [2004] 2 ERNZ 448 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 16
PDF File Link: 2016_NZERA_Auckland_420.pdf [pdf 225 KB]