| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Christchurch 5 |
| Determination date | 09 January 2017 |
| Member | C Hickey |
| Representation | K Harding ; K van Wijngaarden, M Sullivan, K Proctor-Western |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Hartono and Ors v Sajo Oyang Corporation |
| Other Parties | Wahyono, Akmadi, Abduladis, Ropi'I, Santoso, Unwanulloh |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Parties sought removal of matter to Employment Court (“EC”) on ground important questions of law likely to arise |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND –PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Two important questions of law likely to arise. Likely to be significant public interest in matter given potential to affect other employers in same industry. In all circumstances appropriate for matter to be removed. Matter removed to EC. |
| Result | Application granted ; No order for costs |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | ERA s114 ; ERA s178 ; ERA s178(2)(a) ; ERA s178(2)(d) ; Fisheries Act 1996 s103 ; Fisheries Act 1996 s103(5)(a) ; Fisheries Act 1996 s103A ; Fisheries Act 1996 s103A(7)(g) |
| Cases Cited | Hanlon v International Educational Foundation (NZ) Inc [1995] 1 ERNZ 1 (EmpC) ; Idea Services Ltd v Dickson [2011] NZCA 14, [2011] 2 NZLR 522 ; Law v Board of Trustees of Woodford House [2014] NZEmpC 25, [2014] ERNZ 57 |
| Number of Pages | 7 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_5.pdf [pdf 185 KB] |