| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Auckland 33 |
| Determination date | 08 February 2017 |
| Member | E Robinson |
| Representation | N/A |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Labour Inspector v Neelam Ahuja, Chirag Ahuja and Rhythm Ahuja (Re Khoobsurat Ltd) (in Liquidation) and ors |
| Other Parties | Naari Collection Ltd (in Liquidation) and Neelam Ahuja and Chirag Ahuja, Khoobsurat Collections Ltd (in Liquidation) and Neelam Ahuja and Chirag Ahuja |
| Summary | COSTS - Successful arrears claims - Nearly 3 day investigation meeting - Applicant sought contribution to costs - Appropriate to apply notional daily tariff - Respondents to pay applicant $9,500 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($9,500) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($214.68)(filing fees) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA s134A ; ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Fagotti v Acme Ltd [2015] NZEmpC 135, (2015) NZELR 1 ; Labour Inspector v Ahjua [2016] NZERA Auckland 400 ; Labour Inspector v Ahjua [2016] NZERA Auckland 420 ; NZ Automobile Association Inc v McKay [1996] 2 ERNZ 622 (EmpC) ; PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) ; Victoria University of Wellington v Alton-Lee [2001] ERNZ 305 (CA) |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Auckland_33.pdf [pdf 152 KB] |