Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Auckland
Reference No [2017] NZERA Auckland 45
Hearing date 13 and 14 Feb 2017 (2 days)
Determination date 22 February 2017
Member A Fitzgibbon
Representation M Aslam (in person) ; S Worthy
Location Auckland
Parties Aslam v Transportation Auckland Corporation Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct – Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Bus driver
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Video footage supported complainant’s version of events. Fair and reasonable employer could have made decision to dismiss for serious misconduct in circumstances. Process followed by respondent what fair and reasonable employer could have done. Procedure in collective employment agreement complied with. Any defects in process minor and did not result in applicant being treated unfairly. Dismissal justified.
Result Application dismissed ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A ; ERA s103A(3) ; ERA s124 ; ERA s174
Cases Cited Chief Executive of UNITEC Institute of Technology v Henderson (2007) 4 NZELR 418 (EmpC)
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Auckland_45.pdf [pdf 270 KB]