Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No [2017] NZERA Wellington 7
Hearing date 28-Sep-16
Determination date 15 February 2017
Member T MacKinnon
Representation N Flint ; G Ballara
Location Palmerston North
Parties Brokenshire v Spotless Facility Services (New Zealand) Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL – Serious Misconduct - Applicant claimed unjustifiably dismissed by respondent – Maintenance Supervisor
Abstract AUTHORITY FOUND –UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL: Respondent did not conduct sufficient investigation. Likely that decision maker influenced by adverse views about applicant formed by other staff. Dismissal unjustified. REMEDIES: 25 per cent contributory conduct. Respondent to pay applicant $8,866 reimbursement of lost wages. $6,750 compensation appropriate.
Result Application granted ; Contributory conduct (25%) ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($8,866.29) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($6,750) ; Costs reserved
Main Category Personal Grievance
Statutes ERA s103A(2) ; ERA s103A(3) ; ERA s103A(5) ; ERA s124 ; ERA s128 ;ERA s174D(2) ; ERA s174D(3) ; ERA s174E
Cases Cited A Ltd v H [2016] NZCA 419, [2017] 2 NZLR 295
Number of Pages 15
PDF File Link: 2017_NZERA_Wellington_7.pdf [pdf 235 KB]