Restrictions OK
Jurisdiction Employment Relations Authority - Wellington
Reference No WA 39/03
Hearing date 13 Feb 2003 - 14 Feb 2003 (2 days)
Determination date 18 March 2003
Member D Asher
Representation F Mackay ; F & D Cottis (In person)
Location Wanganui
Parties Davidson v F & D Cottis Ltd
Summary UNJUSTIFIED DISMISSAL - Misconduct - Employed by previous owners of business for 10 years - Commenced new employment with respondent after sale and purchase of business - Different practices and operating methods introduced - Concerned at significantly lower profit than expected - Spoke to applicant informally on several occasions regarding accounting of stock - Dismissed for stock unaccounted for in his care - No opportunity to be heard - No notice of allegations - Several allegations not put to applicant for comment - Dismissal substantively unjustified - No system to accurately account for stock - Decision to dismiss not fair and reasonable in circumstances - Procedural unfairness - Dismissal unjustified - Milk deliverer
Result Application granted ; Reimbursement of lost wages ($1,600) ; Compensation for humiliation etc ($7,000) ; Costs reserved
Statutes ERA s65
Cases Cited Birss v Secretary for Justice [1984] 1 NZLR 513;Drummond v Coca Cola Bottlers NZ [1995] 2 ERNZ 229
Number of Pages 12
PDF File Link: PDF file not available for download, please contact us to request a copy.