| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2016] NZERA Auckland 261 |
| Determination date | 01 August 2016 |
| Member | E Robinson |
| Representation | Thuzar Henry-Win, Advocate for Applicant Greg Bennett, Advocate for Respondent |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Huffman v Calibre Haircare Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS - Unsuccessful jurisdiction claim - One day investigation meeting - Respondent sought contribution to costs - Appropriate to apply notional daily tariff - Applicant to pay respondent $3,500 contribution to costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of respondent ($3,500) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93 (EWCA) ; Huffman v Calibre Haircare Ltd [2016] NZERA Auckland 210 ; NZ Automobile Association Inc v McKay [1996] 2 ERNZ 622 (EmpC) ; PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 3 |
| PDF File Link: | 2016 NZERA Auckland 261 [pdf 83 KB] |