| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Christchurch |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Christchurch 43 |
| Determination date | 24 March 2017 |
| Member | P van Keulen |
| Representation | P Brown ; P McMahon |
| Location | Christchurch |
| Parties | Maddock v Canterbury Movers Ltd |
| Summary | COSTS – Discontinued application for compliance with ROS – No investigation meeting - Applicant sought $1,223 contribution towards costs – Amount sought excessive – Would have element of punishment – Not appropriate to apply daily tariff – Respondent to pay applicant $525 plus GST contribution towards costs |
| Result | Costs in favour of applicant ($525 plus GST) ; Disbursements in favour of applicant ($71.56)(filing fee) |
| Main Category | Costs |
| Statutes | ERA Second Schedule cl15 |
| Cases Cited | Merennage v Ritchie’s Transport Holdings Ltd [2016] NZEmpC 22, [2016] ERNZ 107;PBO Ltd (formerly Rush Security Ltd) v Da Cruz [2005] ERNZ 808 (EmpC) |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Christchurch_43.pdf [pdf 13 KB] |