| Restrictions | OK |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Employment Relations Authority - Auckland |
| Reference No | [2017] NZERA Auckland 164 |
| Determination date | 06 June 2017 |
| Member | E Robinson |
| Representation | M Moncur ; M Rusero |
| Location | Auckland |
| Parties | Reddy-Allu v Sahana INZ Ltd t/a Sahana South Indian Restaurant |
| Summary | PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Whether director of respondent should remain party to proceedings - Director alleged to have aided and abetted breaches |
| Abstract | AUTHORITY FOUND -;PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE: Director was sole director and shareholder of respondent. Director was directing ‘mind’ of respondent company and may be found guilty of aiding and abetting if breaches found to have occurred. Director should remain party to proceedings as second respondent. |
| Result | Orders made ; Costs reserved |
| Main Category | Practice & Procedure |
| Statutes | Crimes Act 1961 s66 - ERA s134(2) - ERA s135 - Holidays Act 2003 - Minimum Wage Act 1983 |
| Cases Cited | Musa v Whanganui District Health Board [2010] NZEmpC 120, [2010] ERNZ 236 |
| Number of Pages | 4 |
| PDF File Link: | 2017_NZERA_Auckland_164.pdf [pdf 158 KB] |